tv The Journal Editorial Report FOX Business January 6, 2019 10:00am-11:00am EST
i'm bob massi. i'll see you next week. [ woman vocalizing ] ♪ ♪ ♪ paul: welcome to the journal editorial report as we mark brand-new year in the return of divided government in washington. nancy pelosi reclaiming gavel and and reminding that congress is branch of government. here to expect from the 116th congress, wall street journal columnist and deputy editor dan henninger, columnist kim strassel, kate bachelder odell, assistant editorial page editor james freeman. kate, nancy pelosi is back and i guess you have to give her
credit because, look, there were a lot of people who were saying, criticizing her and she routed her opponents. how did she do it? >> well, paul, consolidated her base. there were 15 members. they were in tough districts and she could win without them and didn't need support. i don't read that as opposition so much, you know, being allowed to walk. but, look, i think she did it by basically agreeing to tilt left on a lot of major issues on the next 2 years. paul: interesting no real freedom caucus to pelosi, there hasn't been in previous congress', democrats seem to fall in line, very interest nothing watch. is that just because they figure, we have power, let's use it, what's behind that? >> i think that's a
philosophical question, they are better than the right is, i think that, look, pelosi has made gestures in your direction, hearings on medicare for all and pelosi supports them. that's a risk going to american public and saying that's an idea that we are flirting with. paul: kim, what do you expect out of the pelosi congress this year? what do you expect them to focus on a year from now, what would they have done? >> well, they will focus on priorities passing bills that would be largely symbolic and, of course, they will not pass in republican senate and not signed on trump, medicare for all type bill, bills on energy, renewable energy, all the things that they will want to set the ground work for for their presidential nominee going forward. beyond that it's going to be investigations, investigations and then where we go from the mueller probe and everything and just ongoing attacks against
president trump. paul: i guess, dan, that's -- i mean, i think investigations is where they are going to go, that's what the base wants, that's what the democratic presidential candidates will be stressing, and once you start the machinery of investigations and you get the mueller report, then maybe it's going to be very hard to stop towards a goal of impeachment? >> yeah, you're suggesting earlier, where do you draw the line on the democratic left? that will be one of nancy pelosi's biggest challenges, trying to decide if she's able to decide to rein in investigations and the full out relentless assault on donald trump because there's going to be a point beyond which certainly trump supporters will crack back against that and possibly people more in the center will wonder is the democratic party about nothing else than trying to take down the president of the united
states. paul: she doesn't want it to be the only defining image. she will push some legislation. is there any possibility at all, any possibility at all of bipartisan cooperation here? >> i hold on hope for maybe an immigration deal, i suppose you could see an infrastructure deal which should be more concerned about as taxpayers. paul: what would be immigration deal? >> the great deal out there sitting out there for a while, give president trump the border wall he wants, in return people brought in here as children illegally to stay. if you wanted to give president trump his entire 25 billion, i think you could get a lot of proimmigration agenda through the question is, do democrats actually want to solve this problem or do they like this fight for political reasons?
and the fact that they have continue today resist any wall funding, any trades suggest they like the fight and not a solution. paul: infrastructure, you mentioned that. the parties are far apart from that. the democrats want trillion dollars of public opinion, the republicans are saying much less and leverage. >> i think you could get president trump to spend taxpayer fund on this, the big sticking point that democrats will not accept is a streamlining of the process of building that limits their ability to use environmental rules to stop development. paul: faster permitting for, for example. dan, what about you, hope for bipartisan cooperation, are you more optimistic than james? >> not in the least. i think the left, democratic left has bitten their mouth, they think they are running the party now. determining to take down
president trump, a lot of new members aren't there to get things done but to take down the president, moderate from states like new jersey, michigan who perhaps will be uncomfortable with a strategy like that and may push for legislation and it's going to be a real challenge for nancy pelosi to manage the two sides of the party. paul: kate, briefly, price control, is there a chance they'll go ahead with that? >> yeah. paul, you mentioned bipartisan cooperation but that frightens me a little bit. the main area is price controls on drugs. i think that would be terrible for u.s. innovation. let's hope they don't agree too much. paul: still ahead from the pelosi congress to emerging 2020 presidential field karl rove with a preview of the democratic playbook in 2019, how the white house should respond as someone in witness protection, i can't tell you anything about myself.
but believe me... i'm not your average consumer. that's why i switched to liberty mutual. they customized my car insurance, so i only pay for what i need. and as a man... uh... or a woman... with very specific needs that i can't tell you about- say cheese. mr. landry? oh no. hi mr. landry! liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ the doctor's office just for a shot.
but why go back there... when you can stay home with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card. ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. there's brushing...and there's oral-b power brushing.
>> i pledge that this congress will be transparent, bipartisan and unifying, that we will seek to reach across the aisle in this chamber and across divisions across the nation. >> hopefully a lot of things we can get done together, i think it'll work out. a little bit different than people are thinking. so i congratulate nancy tremendous, tremendous achievement. paul: speaker nancy pelosi and president trump thursday both striking a bipartisan one as the 116th congress convenes so democrats take control of the house and gear up for 2020 presidential fight is cooperation in washington a real possibility, wall street journal columnist and fox news contributor karl rove served as senior adviser to president george w. bush, good to have you here. >> thank you, paul. paul: let's talk about nancy pelosi, you remember she was there once before when george w. bush was president, what do you
expect out of her this congress? >> well, i'm frankly up in the air about what to expect because on the one hand she had exactly the right notes that she struck there in her remarks, let's try and find ways to work together but on the other hand her actions and her rhetoric around the shutdown don't give a lot of confidence that she's going to be looking for ways to bring things together into compromise and to give everybody a chance to win something to move ahead because the language about the wall no money at all, it's immoral, it's inefficient, it's expensive waste of money, all of these things don't pretend well for getting a deal on the shutdown quickly. paul: doesn't give her a lot of running room. you need an open if you will compromise and she didn't give herself much of an opening. >> i'm not sure she's been in different position earlier, i think one of the problems was the president well intentioned
had a session in the oval office in mid-december with schumer and pelosi which everybody sort of got locked in their positions, she was -- she had a lot of difficulty inside the democratic caucus, this happened early enough that she was able to solve the problem by saying no money for the wall ever and that sort of locked her in a position and now hard to get her out of it. she had to do that in order to assure that she didn't fight battle with democrats newly elected from trump districts concerned that she would be too liberal and the left-wing, ocasio-cortez wing which she was concerned that she would be too centrist. she took care of the problem with the hard left but locked herself in a position hard to get out. paul: looking, of course, across the next year, if you are nancy pelosi, saying, hue can i lure donald trump, let's face it not ideological president in terms of political philosophy, how can i lure him into certain
bipartisan deals where my party would be happy getting 50% of what we want, where would you push? >> well, i would push, james freeman talked about the immigration reform. if i were the democrats, look, let's give him money for the wall and let's get something like a daca fix in return, the dreamers fix in return because the wall will -- will diminished in people's minds and the daca fix which is like a 70 or 80% winner dependent on how you word the question, advantage of both democrats and republicans but it's going to be democrats who will be the people who layed it out on the table and said we are willing to deal with you in order to get it. paul: what would your advice be to president trump how to deal with democrats, my thinking is the more they investigate him and move toward impeachment, the more trump will rely on republicans to salvage for presidency if they do impeach to house and goes to senate, less
like lie to compromise. >> it's very important for republicans particularly in the house to make -- treat democrat suggestions like medicare for all and free jobs and green new deal, treat it seriously and attack those proposals on the merits, the white house would be great to be involved in that but the one thing that requires displib and focus and this white house has neither discipline nor focus when it comes to messaging but the republicans have got to treat these issues seriously in order to show case differences what the democrats are attempting to do and the republican response and the republican response has got to be not only the democrats have bad ideas but the republicans are going to have to give a sense on what it is they would do in lieu. it would fend on how congress responds. if i were the president pick a couple of things that need to get done, let's pass the budget in time. let's fund the government and then spend as most presidents do
when they don't have control of congress on the things which there's executive authority or the president has dominance authority in foreign affairs. the more it looks like he's the victim here, the better off he is but he's got to be responsible reasonable victim and not merely a counterpuncher which is difficult for him to e restrain himself from doing. paul: you see democrats starting left, the first one in elizabeth warren, senator from massachusetts, what do you think of her prospects? >> she's got high name, we will have a serious of 6 primaries this year and she's going to probably farewell in those virtual primaries, the first primary is for talent, early strike there by hiring bernie sanders hiring to work for her,
message on billionaire's corporations, controlling, screwing the little man and little woman. money, we will see how well she does well. that's attractions for robert francis orourke, later we will see organization, social media, she comes as inauthentic and that's advantage of robert francis orourke. she has name idea and strong image, she will end the year in good place but no guaranty that she's nominee, remember barack obama trailed hillary clinton until he won in iowa. paul: fun to carl, karl. when we come back elizabeth warren makes it official, her brand of left-wing populism will play and who will likely follow
her no democratic -we're in a small room. what?! -welcome. -[ gasps ] a bigger room?! -how many of you use car insurance? -oh. -well, what if i showed you this? -[ laughing ] ho-ho-ho! -wow. -it's a computer. -we compare rates to help you get the price and coverage that's right for you. -that's amazing! the only thing that would make this better is if my mom were here. what?! an unexpected ending! is if my mom were here. a business owner always goes beyond what people expect.
that's why we built the nation's largest gig-speed network along with complete reliability. then went beyond. beyond clumsy dials-in's and pins. to one-touch conference calls. beyond traditional tv. to tv on any device. beyond low-res surveillance video. to crystal clear hd video monitoring from anywhere. gig-fueled apps that exceed expectations. comcast business. beyond fast. if his denture can cope with... a steak. luckily for him, he uses super poligrip. it helps give him 65% more chewing power. leaving brad to dig in and enjoy. super poligrip.
>> america's middle class is getting hallowed out and opportunity for young people is shrinking, i'm in this fight all of the way, right now washington works great for the wealthy and well-connected, it's not working for anyone else. paul: senator elizabeth warren following announcement that she's exploring 2020 presidential run. massachusetts democrat looking to counter president trump's populism with version of her, would it resinate with voters and who would follow her to democratic race this year, back with dan henninger, kim
strassel, kate bachelder odell and james freeman. so kim, the message, you saw the video and her early message, what do you make of it? >> well, look, as you just said, elizabeth warren is trying to do trumpism but from the left. now, there are very important policy differences there. this is a woman who is all about medicare for all, she would like to see the federal government actually manufacture its own prescription drugs, she's obviously in favor of much higher taxes, she wants to put vast new restrictions on corporate america including requiring companies over a certain size to get a federal charter and put 40% of its board made of its workers, so these are some very radical ideas expanding the size of government and therefore very different. but to the extent -- paul: kim, is that going to play in a democratic primary, you and i are not going to go there, we
don't want that, what about a democratic primary? >> well, yeah, absolutely. this is a party where the ascendant is progressive left and these are all their ideas. this is -- she's the person that they have been waiting for along with maybe a bernie sanders and they are part of the party that wields a lot of clout these days. paul: talk about her strength, messaging, money, what is the strength? >> the strength that she's interested in public policy, she actually has developed a pretty serious set of proposals while we don't agree with offer competing vision to what republicans want to do, i mean, the biggest risk here, though, i know it's -- it's obviously not a strength but i encourage the viewers to go watch the video of her drinking video in her house because it's revealing about what bad politician she is.
she's gets out of fridge and offers one to husband, why would we do this, it really is -- [laughter] >> revealing that she's not good on the stump and not good at connecting people one-on-one even though i think she has a pretty bright policy mind. paul: here is the thing, dan, this proposal, i mean, medicare for all a lot of them are for, a lot of them are for, green new deal, a lot of them are for, the thing that stands -- where she stands out proposals to reorganize american capitalism, most big companies are chartered at the state level like delaware in particular which offers maximum freedom. the main thing that ceo's are responsible for is to the owners, the shareholders, the people who gave them the capital, all right, she wants to make those ceo's accountable not to shareholders predominantly but to stakeholders who would be employees, who would be
community people, who would be customers, much broader universe of people including a lot of political restrictions on what they could do? >> she calls it the accountable capitalism act in addition to charter she wants to put 40% of employees on the corporate board, restrictions on campaign contributions, this is an idea as kim was suggesting of the progressive left and it probably is an idea that kind of has some resonance with younger people who haven't worked in the private sector in companies that have to function day after day. elizabeth warren's suggestion here, her expectation is that there are enough people dissatisfied with the capitalist system in the united states that they would consider her candidacy seriously which is difficult to do at the moment when the american capitalism system seems to be booming. paul: why would you give money to a corporation, invest in a
corporation where you are not going to be -- the ceo's are going to be accountable to everybody else except for you? >> i think dan hit problem with candidacy, the secondest biggest problem, we will get to first in a minute. the issue, you see in the clip, sounds like republicans like marco rubio who developed a plan , slow growth obama economy and describing an economy that doesn't really exist, thank goodness at the moment, things may change but giving a 2011 message, her biggest problem, though, i think is that her play for identity politics, bogus claim of native american status i think in democratic primary is mortal wound to endorse her, that party would have to say identity politics which have put so much stock in is a fraud and joke and political tool used when appropriate for our purposes but ignored when it's
not useful to us. paul: you disagree with that. that might help her, her attempt to say, see, i'm also native american? >> well, not necessarily. identity politics matter a lot on the left now, her biggest problem is her message is basically negative, it's a downer, it's a pessimistic message, most presidential candidates have to find a way to appeal to better angels, barack obama was very good at that, even as he attacked the wealthy. paul: trade tensions with china, we begin the new year, talk with beijing resume next week, is a fact is, every insurance company hopes you drive safely. but allstate helps you. with drivewise. feedback that helps you drive safer. and that can lower your cost now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? patients that i see about dry mouth.
they feel that they have to drink a lot of water. medications seem to be the number one cause for dry mouth. i like to recommend biotene. it replenishes the moisture in your mouth. biotene definitely works. [heartbeat] essential for pine trees, but maybe not for people with rheumatoid arthritis. because there are options. like an "unjection™". xeljanz xr. a once-daily pill for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well enough. xeljanz xr can reduce pain, swelling and further joint damage, even without methotrexate. xeljanz xr can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma have happened. as have tears in the stomach or intestines, serious allergic reactions, low blood cell counts, higher liver tests and cholesterol levels. don't start xeljanz xr if you have an infection. your doctor should perform blood tests before and while taking xeljanz xr, and monitor certain liver tests. tell your doctor if you've been somewhere fungal infections are common and if you have had tb, hepatitis b or c,
paul: trade tensions with beijing casting a cloud over the economy as we begin 2019. apple slashing revenue forecast for the first time in more than 15 years amid falling iphone sales in china. trade talks are scheduled to resume next week in the hopes of reaching a deal before march first when u.s. tariffs on chinese import are set to rise. john murphy is senior vice president for international policy at the u.s. chamber of commerce, good to see you again, john, let's talk about first the apple announcement, the big blowoff on the stock market after it happened. what does this tell you about the risking for the u.s. economy
from a chinese slowdown? >> turns out the well economy is well connected. paul: imagine that. >> who would have thought of it? china has been one of the fastest growing markets for many companies and it's not just apple, it's host of other companies that are seeing the softness so in transportation sector, in industrials like autos, there is this softness, bank of america just this past week said that tariff and trade war effects have not knocked 6% of share value of s&p 500 in the past year, the economy in the u.s. is strong but these are warning signs. paul: so if you had a recession in china, a lot of people say, great, china, adversary, they
should suffer that's fine, but what you're say if that happened you'd see that the consequences for that, american businesses and american workers as well? >> absolutely. and it happens directly and indirectly. they are in many ways, it's not just these big multinationals whose investments in china are throwing off valuable revenue, it's small or mid-size companies in the u.s. that are importing key components from china and the knock-on effects directly and indirectly through third markets as well. paul: if there's a silver lining here it could be slowdown in growth in china and the potential effects in the united states would give both sides an incentive to sit down as they are going to do smarting next week with march first deadline
and try to knock out a deal that both sides can live with and say they got something out of? >> i think that's absolutely right. both sides are focused on this and concentrating in a new way and we do have a u.s. delegation going to beijing next week to begin these negotiations. the u.s. focus of theft of intellectual property, it's focused on industrial subsidies trying to give some hefty subsidies to key sectors that it regards as important to the future of their economy, the so-called made in china 2025 initiative. these things will be at the focus of these negotiations, the u.s. wants to see real serious forcible commitments to cut subsidies and discussion of new sales of u.s. goods, whether soybeans or what have you. the u.s. is focused on
fundamental. paul: we will buy more soybeans, more jet planes, this or that, more liquefy natural gas, that's all fine, nothing wrong with that, that's not going to do it this time in my estimation, the u.s. wants more and i think u.s. business wants more, what should we -- what are -- what do your companies want to see from this negotiation? >> paul, you're absolutely right, that's not going to cut it, bob lighthizer is focused very much on the fundamental reforms, do i think one of the challenges we are looking at right now is subsidies provided to these key sectors, provided by the chinese government, the u.s. is looking for ways that those can be cut in a verifiable, enforceable way in addition to the intellectual property protections that i mentioned, so that's certainly where the focus is going to be.
paul: i think you will see the chinese are going to say, fine, these will be -- we will do this and might even change legislation in some cases, for example, having to do with joint ventures allowing more ownership by foreign companies than 50% or ip theft but it seems to me that enforcement is going to be the key, that we have to be able to say here is how we can track you if you break the agreements and then have some mechanism for -- for retaliating. >> yes, this is exactly where people are trying to come up with creative new solutions. now the threat of tariffs is out there, but for us in the u.s. business community, you know, at the end of the data riffs are a tax paid by americans, american consumers and businesses, what can we do that isn't tariff-based. paul: quick question because we don't have much time, the new nafta right now, does the administration have the votes to pass that in this congress?
>> well, no. nobody knows yet and democrats have been lighting up in the congress saying that they will be looking for more on the enforcement of labor provisions and possibly some other issues. but honestly, members of congress are just starting to focus on this. we in the business community who support the agreement because we need that certainty of the access to two most important export markets, i think we have a steep road to climb here but we will be out there trying to explain to members of congress just how important the markets are and how we need continuity. paul: wall street wild ride continues, stronger than expected job's report sent stocks swinging, what the market volatility signals about the u.s. economy in the new year?
>> our country is doing better by far than any other country in the world from an economic standpoint. we are the talk of the world and we had glitch in the stock market but still up around 30% from the time i got elected and it's going to go up once we settle trade issues and once a couple of other things happen, it has a long way to go. paul: president trump touting the strength of the american economy and down playing recent swings in the stock market, u.s. employers dramatically stepped up hiring in december adding remarkable 312,000 new jobs and encouraging 2018, what can we expect in the new year? we are back with dan henninger, kim strassel, kate bachelder odell, james freeman. opportunity to spike the football with job's report, big number. >> it is kind of nice who urged
cut in corporate tax rate and reduction in red tape in washington for years and years to see results that are i think beautiful as the president might say. paul: wage is up too. >> december job report almost nothing in it you couldn't celebrate. revisions to previous meaning more jobs created than -- paul: 3.9 to 3.7, that's okay? >> more people coming to labor force. you have more than a million people in the prime working years since president trump got elected coming back to labor force or joining it. this is what we have been hoping for, labor force, participation going up, jobs up, wages up, really great news and especially interesting because we've heard so much about the tax cuts were just going to cause a sugar high, just the first quarter or second quarter boom, second quarter boom won't last and now looks like surprising strength at the end of the year. paul: let me be spoil sport
here, that's my specialty, people will say, yeah, job market strong number but lagging indicater and we see a lot of other indicators, manufacturing index really fell off, global growth really slow, you saw the apple numbers, stock market, financial markets have been tightening, credit markets tightening, slower in 2019? >> could be slower in 2019. the big issue looming is in fact, the trade negotiation with china. as president trump just said himself in the clip we looked at, stock market had this -- he called it glitch in december. [laughter] paul: bigger than glitch in my 401(k), i tell you that. >> you talked to john murty about the issues, what's going on here with china and what the united states wants from chinese and xi jinping in my mind a significant structural change in chinese economic model.
if you think that's going to happen by early march which is deadline president trump has set after which he will impose tariffs if he doesn't get what he wants, i think we are going to long-term tariff regime. you are talking about a very long trade negotiation with the chinese government. paul: kim, if we go to that kind of scenario, china retaliates, i think both -- both economies will suffer enormously. there's a big ib keptive for them at -- incentive at least bh sides and even implementation will take some time. >> yeah, of course, as you were talking about with the last interview, mr. murphy. these are interconnected economies. their economy is hurting far more than ours is.
that's a good thing. they have to understand and the president alluded this, he didn't use the word, what's hanging over the stock market and problematic is simply uncertainty and trade is a big aspect of that uncertainty. the fed another one, but those are the things that if they could set settled and investors and corporations knew what was coming, then we will probably see that reflected in stock market and, again, in greater growth. paul: kate, anything we think may be progrowth coming out of congress this year that would help the economy? >> the short answer is no, paul. i think if anything we are going to have to rely on a gop senate to stop house proposals that would damage growth in the economy, i'm talking about, you know, more harassment on businesses, trying to stop the trump deregulatory efforts which the house is going to certainly
try to do. maybe trying to raise the corporate tax rate which in addition to being higher would add more uncertainty about whether the rate is going to stay. so hopefully there's a check on bad policies but i don't think anything could be put in the progrowth column at this point. paul: briefly james, did the federal reserve, cautious in moving ahead which the market loved? >> i don't think they made a mistake? we might disagree on this, but i think this is a very strong u.s. economy, fortunately so far the power of the trump tax cuts and regulatory tax cuts is bigger than the downside of the trump tariffs. maybe that changes after march first, but i think there's a compelling argument that xi jinping, you don't have to be a thuggish dictator or communist but you have to realize like most recent predecessor you have to let markets work. paul: i think they should have
paused. mitt romney blasted president trump in op-ed and speculation of 2020 challenges. >> we will have differences and i expect each senator will express their own views as they think comcast business built the nation's largest gig-speed network. then went beyond. beyond chasing down network problems. to knowing when and where there's an issue. beyond network complexity. to a zero-touch, one-box world. optimizing performance and budget. beyond having questions. to getting answers. "activecore, how's my network?" "all sites are green." all of which helps you do more than your customers thought possible. comcast business.
beyond fast. it's been a long time since andrew dusted off his dancing shoes. luckily denture breath will be the least of his worries. because he uses polident 4 in 1 cleaning system to kill 99.99% of odor causing bacteria. polident. clean. fresh. and confident. of odor causing bacteria. comcast business built the nation's largest gig-speed network. then went beyond. beyond chasing down network problems. to knowing when and where there's an issue. beyond network complexity. to a zero-touch, one-box world. optimizing performance and budget. beyond having questions. to getting answers. "activecore, how's my network?" "all sites are green." all of which helps you do more than your customers thought possible. comcast business. beyond fast.
>> i was surprised at mitt romney, i hope he will be a team player and if he's a team player that'll be great. i will say this, if he fought really hard against president obama like he does against me he would have won the election. i think he's going to end up being a team player, i think he agrees with many of the things that we've done and many things that we have in mind, we will see what happens.
paul: this was president trump responding to mitt romney, blasted the president's character, he has not risen to the mantle of the office, romney denying that the move is sign of possible 2020 primary challenge so if it's not a primary challenge potential setting him up for that, dan, what is he up to? >> it is a primary challenge and that's part of the problem with mitt romney, what he said is not credible, you show up first day in washington and launch this attack on the president of the united states. paul: why is it not credible? do you disagree? >> yeah, i think i disagree with some of it. i want to read some of the statements as an example. he said i will speak out against significant statements or actions that are divisive, racist, sexist, antiimmigrant, dishonest or destruct i have to democratic institutions, paul, that is pandering, that's pandering to every buzz word in the antitrump left, the idea that they are always suburban people who agree with that, mitt
is trying to assemble his 2020 coalition. it could not be more obvious. paul: kim, you know, when you run in a primary challenge, nobody ever wins those, they can do damage to the incumbent but i can't recall somebody who won a challenge like that, win a couple of primaries but you don't win the nomination. >> yeah, everything is stacked against you, the power of sitting president is enormous and remember, that even if that president hasn't necessarily rallied the entire spectrum of the conservative world around him, the institutions of the presidency are behind him too, the party apparatus, everything design today protect them, make it hard for challenger to succeed, romney has to know that but all i could say is the animus that drives a lot of never trumpers is so huge that it clouds their clear thinking
on the success possibility. paul: kate, one of the things that was striking to me romney didn't really note a major policy difference, he had generals, talk about character. the question is where would he draw policy lines with the president? would it be trade, would it be immigration, foreign policy i suppose but they weren't in that op-ed? >> well, that's what stuck out to me on the op-ed, trump has had accomplishments but things republicans don't agree on and misunderstanding on why people took a chance on trump. would mitt romney released a list of judge that is he would have put on the court, i don't know the answer to that, repealed the clean power plan or withdrawn from the paris agreement, i think there are some confounding realities of trump is why people took a chance on him aside from character, in spite of it. i think mitt is not really
understanding that. paul: and i mean, if i were advising romney and i'm not, but i would suggest if you want to take trump, fine, take him on trade, for example, use -- say, we will rein in mr. president, rein in your ability to willy nilly impose tariffs, okay, you will have to get -- have to be a better reason than you woke up one day than impose tariffs and called it national security. >> i think we are all getting toward the point which is this piece had no point other than to present mitt romney as plan b for 2020 if republican voters tire of donald trump. paul: setting him up a year from now if thing goes bad with trump, the economy gets bad, impeached, mueller report? >> no one believes it because romney -- paul: that's not it. do you believe that? you don't? >> you look at romney's history,
embraced or shun trump over and over depending on when it was convenient for mitt mitt romney. you had be many measures a better record than warren buffet. since then political record not impressive. paul: dan, last word. >> significant figure, he will be a player in washington for the next year and he's very adept guy at doing this sort of thing, it would be impossible to avoid mitt for the next 12 months. paul: we have to take one more break, when we come back the panel's predictions for as a fitness junkie, i custom
that's why i switched to liberty mutual. they customized my insurance, so i only pay for what i need. i insured my car, and my bike. my calves are custom too, but i can't insure those... which is a crying shame. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ the doctor just for a shot. with neulasta onpro patients get their day back... to be with family, or just to sleep in. strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it
or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.
predictions but sometimes you have to take easy shots, i will predict that house democrats impeach donald trump this year, they have vowed up and down the campaign trail that's not what they were going to do but lo and behold the first day in congress, you already have legislation from the democratic side file to impeach him. i don't think it's going to happen right away. they will hold off until they get a report from robert mueller and see what they get from their investigations, some of the leaders might not want it but the pressure from the left will be too great to resist. paul: james. >> paul, we have been talking about how we have been enjoying 1980's style economic growth, job creation, we are also going to enjoy 1980's style college basketball, my prediction that georgetown now couched by 1980's star player patrick and st. john's coached by 1980's star chris will be back in ncaa tournament. paul: i sense you're not a duke fan?
>> absolutely -- [laughter] paul: kate. >> paul, my prediction is that we year we get deal on young adult, dreamers who were brought illegally. it could trade border security and wall funding for the president and trump has said he has compassionate towards the individual who were brought here and now serve in military and go to college, so i think that -- i think this comes after favorable supreme court rule to go trump and it would be good for the country. paul: dan. >> ly make a prediction about the outcome of mueller report but i could make prediction that mueller report won't come out in 2019, you never know. but if he does issue this report, the two things of the center is whether the president's campaign colluded with the russians at a very high level and whether president trump obstructed justice. on both of those counts i think the answer is going to be no. paul: so no collusion, but impeachment anyway.
that's it for this week's show, thanks to my panel and to all of you for watching, i'm paul gigot, we hope to see you right here next week. bartiromo's week begins right now. ♪ >> welcome to maria bartiromo's wall street that helps position you for the hybrid i'm in for maria. average founder and former white house community director anthony security is my special guest and later initial my foxbusiness all-star is here to talk about everything that matters to your money. turning to first job report of the new year. blockbuster one. us economy added 312,000 jobs in the month of december and on up limit rate did pick up slightly higher before present